The United Nations General Assembly resolution requesting “ an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the obligations of States in respect of climate change” is, in some ways, a surprising document. The main surprise is that it exists at all – international environmental law experts have noted that inviting a court into the politically-driven legally-averse realm of climate negotiations would represent a “paradigm shift,” or expressed doubts about whether such an invitation would result in an outcome helpful to vulnerable states or the world. Nevertheless, amid increasing frustrations with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) process, the possibility of such a referral kept coming up. The question has now been formally asked.
Read MoreThe pressure to enact ambitious climate policy is higher than ever, as the IPCC clarifies the urgency of the challenge, and key global summits draw closer. In addition to emissions reduction targets and investment in green infrastructure, political leadership in the European Union and the United States are considering a “carbon border tax.” This is a duty on imported goods, determined based on the carbon (or greenhouse) footprint of the process used to manufacture the good in the country of origin. These are attempts to mimic the “climate club” approach of the Montreal Protocol, but need to pay much closer attention to the details of that agreement. In this blog, Fletcher School junior fellow, Tarun Gopalakrishnan explains why.
Read More